What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices.  how to protect from 5g  for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.



While this sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.

But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
https://note1s.com/notes/VL66A25J  for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.